If the custom error page is not configured to response with the correct status code then the HTTP response could end up looking like: Which would almost guarantee that there would be duplicate content issues for the site with the search engines, as the search spiders are simply going to assume that the error page is a normal page, like any other.

asp net dating site-82

Not to mention that there are still many missing APIs, and even entire areas that were deliberately excluded from . Many people don't need fast-moving libraries, they need stable stuff that can gracefully integrate into their older stuff without taking the risk of breaking everything.

NET Standard) that means stuff can be built faster than Net Fx or even Netstandard. NET Core 2.0 are stubs that will never (functionally) work. I don't believe that's what (most) people are looking for.

Freut euch auf eine Partynacht auf höchstem Niveau in angenehmer Gesellschaft!

Das Besitos am legendären Rostocker Stadhafen erwartet euch mit einem Mix der besten Partyklassiker der 80er & 90er Jahre, sowie den Clubhymnen der vergangenen 3 Jahrzehnte bis hin zu den einschlägigen Disco-Klassikern von heute! Es wird aufregend, es wird spannend, es wird vor allem geheimnisvoll!

Drawing as above (interesting wrinkle here: we need old image formats like TIFF, which new OSS libraries don't support) Connecting to WCF/SOAP apis - still tons and tons of these out there Windows crypto apis (including RSACng, ECDSA, and CSP for PKI tokens) WPF guis - our clients are not switching to windows 10 any time soon and even when they do they won't want Store apps Microsoft Office interop (particularly access and excel) for data import and export Visual Studio extensibility Third party plugins like the Oracle ADO. It would totally make sense if core required standard 2.1 because there are things that they need that are not in the framework at the moment. Frustration Continues Nick Craver of Stack Overflow exemplifies the frustration that many teams have.

We have still-live, actively-developed code which relies on: NTLM authentication (including advanced scenarios around tokens and SPNs) System. We forked the header parser implementations from Http Client and System. Http and renamed them (https://github.com/aspnet/Http Abstractions/tree/d1d9bceff56cb44a194ae36923ce687e5e353006/src/Microsoft. So I'm still not sure of what the point of the standard is - if it gets abandoned virtually as soon as it gets created.

I tried to find a solution to this problem, but I didn't have any luck finding anything, other than people who were also looking for a way to get around it.

So I did what I usually do, and created my own solution.

But they are real technologies, which are the basis of new app development - we need a version of . Right now our position is manageable: we isolate "legacy" (really: platform-specific) dependencies into their own components which are net461 specific. The port to 1.x is almost entirely a lateral one, there are few features in it for us.

NET provider Some of these technologies are never going to be supported by Core CLR. So we had to wait till the full framework supported those additional functionalities before we could use the latest version of core. But instead they are just abandoning the standard making the standard useless (if I'm understanding this confusing situation correctly). NET Standard isn’t quite so dire, as it is still a useful way to offer 3rd party libraries for both . After spending countless hours porting their code to ASP. NET Framework, they are feeling like it was a wasted effort: There's still a huge fundamental gap here.

The solution comes in the form of a small HTTP module that hooks onto the Http Context. When an error occurs, the module checks if the error's type is an Http Exception.